Do Feel Learn

this is a consumer process of which many marketing strategies has been designed, to cultivate adoption for supposedly low involvement products

Somehow this theory sounds applicable for how you should do religious responsibilities. 'Just Do It' as what Nike used to say. However, one should note that the immediacy of each step to occur consecutively after the previous, might probably differ on each person. Hence, probably the value of patience and preservation are also required  as part of the observance, as the overall virtue of every religious accounts will resonate best in this ideal condition. Thus faith should go directly towards the Order, as the source of All, including ordeals, happiness, and our presence. Hence the 'Do' should be consciously done to fulfil the Order, that ideally to do so one should require less consideration, or avert from any form of dissonance after knowing the order. 

Then, it tickles me to understand how this would relate to the low involvement nature of the theory? the answer probably due to the nature of any human's real authorities themselves, who has little whatsoever power to even cause effect in their own life. that even rezeki is predetermined, that even appearance was not within parents' consent, that the course of ones lives had undergone places that they never expected before. That eventually the ideal condition to do/be is 'Surrender' which somewhat implies that no one had no whatsoever significance, thus the low involvement. Therefore might be the saying All Praise Be To God (Alhamdulillah),is highly advised anytime ones poised to put ownselves in somewhat significant position after doing meaningful things to others.

Yet, if we notice, the 'what to learn' part had also been revealed along with the 'requirements'. What's needed now is conscience to look out for them, and to find relevance amongst them, through reflections of own's experiences. Hence one would feel some degrees of righteousness. Hence ones will learn its rightful nature. Insya Allah.

Again this is only a ponder

Now that I'm Here, What have I done, and What's Next

Coming to this day, I realized how tarnished the ability to speak in this language has been. Somewhat, journey-wise, as the mind travels through time, some parts lost and some remains. And that the fluency has somewhat stuttered, lost in translation. That also, traveller's-wise, I have unconsciously allowed back little by little old habits that had actually been overcome. And so much about everything that leads to today that flashed back old memories, of coincidences, of hardships, of courage and discourage that somehow should be valued more today, to help facing tomorrow. Or should I just not share it here. Anyway, again coincidences, again found some relevance (at this early stage), and again I seek meaning to it. Bismillah. Hopefully this meant something.

Have you noticed the proximity?

What started off in Tunisia, had spread eastward to Egypt, Yaman, Iran, Bahrain, and later closer to the land of origin, Libya. Similar problem, overly extended political regime. But, what exactly the underlying issues? Some of the countries involved are oil-rich countries which has years of oil reserves. Does poverty and increased food price has to do with it? I just couldn’t believe it.

If the unrest was the result of oppression, Surely some would escape the mainstream media, especially the western, considering the sentiment built over years towards the middle east.

Somehow people reacts similarly towards the fact that their leaders had been around long enough to agonize the people’s sanity, which led to the stress of everyday living which was then doubled with the worsening economic conditions. Or, that they have lived so comfortably that their trust towards the government had been easily influenced through state media by not showing the bad news. hence when reality started to strike the homes of middle-income, well educated families, they reacts the way they see fit to overturn the condition, which is through strikes, which consequences were less likely considered.

Some think that the problem is in the monarch system, that democracy was more favourable. but other monarchs were fine. our closest neighbour still maintain the monarchy and they seem fruitful from the order. Britain is fine. The Saudis are fine. Jogjakarta is fine too. Some supposedly democratic countries are in turn fail to give the poeple what they want, giving the unhappy faces.

Is the leadership void from everyday lives of the people, in such a way that the people felt they have been dealing with their problems themselves? are presence the underlying issues?

Still Im not assured. somehow I feel that this is what the promise was. that one day history will repeat itself and someone will emerge to bring the answer.

Feb.19.2011 / 2am

an issue of difference

Feb 14, 2008 (1:51am) Now I know how people could differ to such extent that each lives facing certain directions that may push against each other or pull each other away. i imagine a humongous extensive field that could be filled with any possible thought that all generations could think or believe, and two 150deg-vision front-eyed men facing directions far ahead which symbolizes all thoughts and belief that he may think (if he constantly facing that direction).

to be cont..

Jan 26, 2011... and usually conflict starts when a person’s view intersects with other and the force within themselves tell the other to turn their body and look on the things their looking at, in a way, facing the direction as he himself likes it to be seen.

But then again it just show how we have incapacitated others by doing so, when infact, or most probably, the objects within our vision was part of a greater system that was not meant to be seen with such narrow perspective. had we not learnt that rock is a liveless thing, we would have been managing its sustenance just like other forms of creature, as we would have known the balance it has been providing to the earth.

how human differ to each other may rooted to what they see since the beginning of their lives, and which route they have been taking to adjourn. and therefore, ideally, within a peaceful heart a man should not argue, but instead, listen.

1.26.11 / 1am

The Universal ZOOMABILITY

It seems that this world is at many level of zoom-ability. You can downgrade the smallest thing to the second smallest thing…

—but sometimes we forgot to enclose it with ‘according to human recorded achievements’, or in ‘history’ as for we mention this kind of ‘purposive self-claimed superlative discovery’, thus somehow we ignored its true realm—

Imagine if an atomic structure resembles the celestial structure. Earth would merely be a particle revolving around the core, the sun. Compared to Earth, we’re only small little creatures wandering around its surface who inhabited only parts of its land.

Now the question: Which would it be to an atom?

But yet, somehow, we have been affecting the earth with many human errors, which took us thousands of years of civilizations. Be reminded about how small Earth is compared to universe.

Or was it all just exaggeration? Human should be responsible to what they’ve done, and effect hadn’t actually caused by the crime. I mean if it’s not Allowed, It wouldn’t have happened right?

Magnificent this universe is by still being the untouchable even with several million times of magnification.

Oct.23.2008 / 7am

things that were just left hanging in my brain - and some stuff i browsed lately

the stories I've been watching lately

1. the large hadron collider and its capability to smash particles into its constituents :the quarks and leptons and so on, and anti matter which is feared to act as a black hole in our universe.

2. The quarks and the realitivity of the presence of elctrons and protons in an atom. and what consitutes it.

3. The Black hole, the variety and its signs that sets apart from other cosmic obejcts. recently found that it appears not only in stellar form (smaller) and supermassive (centre of a galaxy) but also in various sizes at surprisingly unexpected places trhough out a galaxy. stellar black hole means a star that has lost its energy due to constant burning will submit to its own gravitational pull and suck up its mass and the things around it. at certain point it spews out the electrons perpendicularly to the disk shape rotation, creating a shot. any other objects on its way can be effected as what he recent NASA photo found. two close black hole bearing galaxies spewed over electrons jets from its companion.

to add: perpendicular to our solar system is the closest star Alpha Centauri.

4. There is a story inspired by sumeritans regarding the newly found solar object (NASA: Eris, myths: Nibiru) that will re-appear close to earth on 2012 as what the sumeritans been warned 4800 years BC. its appearence will be once in every some what thousands of years and believed to have effected the earth. it is said that its oval shaped orbit is wide enough to ‘visit’ every planet in the solar system and also the sun, thus people called it the crosser planet. if eventually its getting too close to the earth, due to its massive gravitational pull, when it passes over, it’ll pull the earths gravity and cause the earth to still for few days and strong enough to tilt earth’s axis to 90 degres, and thus created natural disasters bigger than every other human have witnessed. after that it’ll leave chaotic earth histerically.

this coincide with what i’ve been told regarding the signs of the last days that, there will be nights as long as 3 nights, and the sun will rise from the west. (or the other way around) from this point onward human repentance is void.

the time 2012 came from an ancient prediction thus i dont believe it. this only sparks curiosity of possible ways of how the Signs will finally come to reality.

and it seems the organization that beleive in the date so much made a website (www.decemver212012.com) on it and based on preditions obviously would have not pose any clear and convincing facts about the event, but only distortions of a prediction.

————————————————————-

oo and… this just keep my curiosity up…

The little Prophet Yousoff told his fatherProphet Ya’cob AS that 11 stars, the moon and the sun prostrated unto him in his dream.

If man’s prostration is marked by a gesture shown during sujud in salaat. what did the prophet AS see in his dream?

Oct.14.2008 / 1am

PLANTS KNEW MORE THAN WE THOUGHT THEY DO

Few days ago I watched Mythbusters episode on myths around organisms. Of some episodes that I've watched, this one is the most stunning, and thrilling. The team were faced by a theory that living organisms are somewhat interconnected (if I'm not mistaken).Humans are interconnected as we’re reacting toward each other, and so do animals. what about other living organisms? to answer this they use a polygraph similar to a lie detector to proof it with an analogy that if somehow living organisms do have reaction towards a stimulation faced/provided by other organism (in this case: harm), the polygraph would react. Firstly they experimented on a plant and then leukocyte (white blood cell), and lastly on bacteria in a yoghurt.

Although from the last two objects they experimented on, they didnt find satisfiying answer (on they’re understanding of what may explains interconnected organisms; owner’s leucocyte didnt react when the owner’s is electricuted, and bacteria-ful yoghurt also didnt react when it’s poured with hot water), –and overall they call it busted– the result of the first experiment is the one that captured most of my attention.

who knows something that’s been quiet most of the time -well, all time- can actually react instantly on a stimulation, quietly. Believe it or not, plants invisibly react when they’re harmed and shockingly..they do know when human is about to harm them. the polygraph pen pulsed when Tory (the scientist-co hosting the show) from afar concentrated his mind to hurt the contained plant without even physically touching it.

Although overall they called it BUSTED, Should this particular inspiring-phenomenon answer other questions?

Should this lead to a new understanding of plants? of organisms? of something beyond physical organisms? of dead organs?

At this point, I suspect that something could explain it all—i’m thinking of the right word to explain ‘nyawa’ in english, it’s not a ‘chance for living’ as what LIFE (the usual translation for nyawa) implies, but it is more of a sole object, that is in an object by itself that are contained by the organisms (set of organs) that makes them alive, in arabic it’s called ‘RUH’. I somehow feel that only organisms with ‘Nyawa’ is eligible for this experiment, thus parts of organisms, or simply ‘moving’ organisms should be considered as somethingelse. something that is not ‘bernyawa’.

Should there be another criteria of classification other than what science has described till today. or even more fundamentally questioning wether it should be classification or stratification of creature–what a creature have that others don’t,thus the more they have the higher their level is, the least their potential, the lower their position is. What other thing that science has been failing to see, to proof.

——————————————–anyway————————————–

Knowing that plants do get hurt, you probably need to reconsider some reasons when you stomp on grass, when you cut twigs off branches, when you pulled away petals of roses, when you throw away a bouquet of flowers, when you chainsawed a tree, when you burn off a forest. When we have the least conscience that it might hurt. when in some cases it’s merely casual, unintentional.

Also, probably by now people who call themselves vegetarian due to animal’s right violation should find other reason to eat plant-related-produce, because plants react on harm as animals do. what differentiates the two is, that most plants do not show their reaction when it’s harmed, or should we say, all these while we never knew how to comprehend their reaction as how we hear, or see, or feel animal’s reaction when they’re hurt.

Thus the problem was not on killing organisms for food, it’s about the intention when you’re taking their lives. in this case, animal’s right is right to certain extent, that killing them to fulfill you’re instinct of killing is wrong, but slaughtering them for surviving is right. Slaughtering by intentionally hurting is wrong, slaughtering with a consideration for immediate dying is right. Thus how far should we call Animal’s RIGHT as right, as we are us, not them. and we previously failed to describe our fellow plants’ rights and led ourselves across the line–if there should’ve been plant’s rights. How right is human’s RIGHT if apparently the right thing to do is about the intention. not what the RIGHTS have authorized.

Enquire more of what other thing that are considered as LIVING THINGS and to what extent today’s science have classified that something is truly not living. Well plants are considered organism due to the ‘growing’ feature, but never solely to its ability of immediate reaction. what about those that loose from our sight, due to its vastness, speed and incomparability to human. Something’s that is too big or too small, too fast or too slow, too complicated or simply too simple. What about earth?

Feb.29.2008 / 11pm