Thursday, December 20, 2012
Next : The critique
As the major development fund is always distributed through credit with certain amount of interest, doesn't that just categorize the whole business derivatives as usury(ous)?
How is 5% of interest being treated differently than how 5% of alcohol is being treated?
Wouldn't it be better if then a debitor willingly return the favor of a creditor whose money was lended to run the business? and then the creditor rejected it just to keep the situation clean of any possible usury.
There are blessings in every honestly earned fortune, but how much is destroyed when an usury is involved?
When the rich is richer through every penny deposited, who deserve the crisis when the debt is unaccredited?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment