A salute to this politician who's been speaking consistently for over 30 years, who's been neglected by the media, who's gained alot of criticism for being outspoken and for speaking the truth even by his own fellow partisan. Who's now gained alot of attention, as some of his earlier speech, some made decades ago, were recently proven to be right. Imagine, 30+ years to be finally heard. and yet still some denied and felt discontent about him receiving supports from people of all walks of life, as they're afraid, that everything will never be the same, for them including the mainstream media who's been backed by big corporations, which will somehow be affected by This Man's consistent proposal : To End The Fed, The culprit of recurring crisis(es) in his country. Will he be the real agent of change? He seems perfectly right, but then Who has the Might to really end a plight?
Predation is what human now be, when faced by any possible austerity, rolling an authority down has now become somewhat easy, this had actually been shown by his country's past history. of a man by the name Kennedy. But then age is what future holds, a year or two or even three folds, we never know until it unfolds. this man has somewhat perceived as being too old. Yet, again, Who Owns the right to end a plight? a plight that ends their very own right. A plight that started with human greed, a misconception of what often called as being succeed.
Predation is what human now be, when faced by any possible austerity, rolling an authority down has now become somewhat easy, this had actually been shown by his country's past history. of a man by the name Kennedy. But then age is what future holds, a year or two or even three folds, we never know until it unfolds. this man has somewhat perceived as being too old. Yet, again, Who Owns the right to end a plight? a plight that ends their very own right. A plight that started with human greed, a misconception of what often called as being succeed.
Somehow I remember one of my post on my age-old blog (posted on Nov 25 2005), concerning at how some people could not understand at how the basic law of supply and demand works, during the Intro to Econ class back in M'sia. The law indicates that demand raises as the price lowered hence supply reduces, and supply raises as the price hightened hence demand will get lower. This law might be perceived as natural, as it includes innate human greed in its conception if you notice. the producer would want more profit, the consumer would want more to be consumed. which inherently indicates they have never satisfied with whatever their condition is, that holding up goods is natural, that consuming more is also natural. in a different context, this shows that there are actually inaccessibilities to goods due to price within the society that needs to be addressed. so when the price hiked, demands would remain, as the rich sincerely buy more and give to the poor.
But then how ideal will this be, when all in TV, reminds you of what you could be. the picture might be right, but then it's all merely pleasant to the sight. Teary eyes , laughing cries, together you might see, a condescending ideality. but how would you know, that you've had your part, that what you didnt sow will bring you apart. that all this while you've been nothing but a spectacle to an ideality, brought forth with unprecedented superiority.
But then how ideal will this be, when all in TV, reminds you of what you could be. the picture might be right, but then it's all merely pleasant to the sight. Teary eyes , laughing cries, together you might see, a condescending ideality. but how would you know, that you've had your part, that what you didnt sow will bring you apart. that all this while you've been nothing but a spectacle to an ideality, brought forth with unprecedented superiority.
then again this is another ponder, no other means intended.
No comments:
Post a Comment